Showing posts with label drama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drama. Show all posts

Sunday, April 14, 2024

The Zone of Interest (2023)

Bizarre as it sounds, for a movie I really didn't like that much, I'm going to be writing a lot about it.
Mainly so I can empty my head with all of the thoughts, good and mostly bad, swimming around my head about it.

Two subject matters shown a lot in film and media in general that show the worst of humanity- The Holocaust and slavery. Both are subjects we were still learning from and aspiring to be better people by not repeating past mistakes. And this is by no means an editorial about how we should stop doing movies on these dark corners of human history.
If anything, this is my critique on how "The Zone of Interest" sort of missed the mark telling its Holocaust era story. At least it did when I was actually watching it. Afterwards, that's an entirely different story.

Here's the basic premise:
The movie follows the family of a notable SS officer. Their home is situated in the country outside Auschwitz, arguably the most famous of the concentration camps, if not the most well-known one. And basically, they're maintaining a typical everyday life indifferent to the atrocities happening just on the other side of the tall fences and barbed wire. 
It shows the family dynamic between the officer and his wife and their commonplace struggles. But it also shows him doing his job without us really seeing him in a day in his work life. 

The biggest issue I have this movie in general-- despite the muted palettes of colors used throughout the movie and the plainness of how the characters look (except when Rudolf is in uniform), it very much feels like Jonathan Glazer chose style over substance. 
It was a foreign film where there were subtitles, but it also had that cringey artsy feel to it. 
I'm not joking- there are 3 moments in the movie where there's a screen devoid of any visual and it stays that way for a long time. Imdb had the minutes- the first 5 minutes is a black screen with droning intense music. There's a midpoint where they show a bunch of flowers in the garden and it ends with the screen being washed over with red and it's a solid red for 20 seconds. Then before the credits roll- a black scroll with intense music. No time stamp on this one, but I expected to see a postscript of some kind, only to be disappointed and further disillusioned. 
There's also two night scenes where this girl is planting fruit in the ground- the scenery is black but you can see the outline of some objects and she and the fruit are ghostly white. Because this occupied the scenes where Rudolf is reading bedtime stories, I didn't know if this was a nightmare sequence or it was actually happening. It was the latter, supposedly. I just didn't want it to give me nightmares once I got through this movie because it was spooky.

This movie won 2 Oscars. One was for Sound and that was the part I really didn't like. One too many moments where a single note was held way too long. I get that the point was to make the audience uncomfortable. But it accomplished it in probably the way they didn't intend. It's sort of like uncomfortable silences in conversation that go on way too long. The movie is an hour and 46 minutes, but I was thinking through some of these scenes-- this could've been edited out or shortened.

As for the movie itself... I was just bored. At one point I even fell asleep because I was waiting for some dramatic turn of events to happen. There was no plot at all. The closest thing we had to it was Rudolf and Hedwig talking about his transfer to another camp and how she doesn't want to uproot their family to move with him... since they have the "perfect" country life where they are. He ultimately grants her this request.
None of the characters are really interesting to spend time with or to even look at. Although for a movie like this, it'd be sending the wrong message if they cast well-known or at least good looking people to play the roles. Everyone was very plain looking and there was no dynamic range at all.

Oddly enough, I got more out of this movie reading about it afterwards than actually watching it. 
We never see the atrocities firsthand but there are a little hints of it sprinkled throughout. Some were more obvious than others. The ones not so obvious, it was shocking to read. 
There were two scenes where there was a lot of washing and sanitizing. The first is the children swimming in the river by the house, their father finds human remains in the river and they're immediately brought back and scrubbed to the bone. I knew the 
significance of what he found, but it took me a while to realize they were scrubbing because it was Jewish remains, not just human remains. Then there's another scene where he commits adultery with an inmate and the scene after, he's cleaning away the "filth." Nothing graphic is shown, but it was still a moment that made me think. 

Two things I saw early on in the movie and completely missed the significance. At one point, Hedwig is trying on a fine fur coat and the lipstick inside it. Then she gives it to a maid to have washed and the lining fixed. I thought maybe that the wife was actually one of the maids and she didn't want to get caught wearing the wife's clothes. Nope-- I completely missed the fact the coat had been taken from one of the Jewish prisoners.
Then a scene later where the two boys are playing with a bunch of teeth. Again, I didn't recognize until reading about it that they were gold teeth taken from prisoners. 
The last time I saw anything relating to the Holocaust was in college- 2008- so there were a lot of things associated with that time I forgot about.

The callousness did show well in the scenes where Rudolf was talking about the design for the Final Solution in the camps. How "loads" would be moved from one scene to the next and later "reloaded." And he says it so casually like he's doing dirty laundry. :cringe: 

The phrase "banality of evil" repeated in nearly every review I read. To the point, I got sick of reading it over and over again. 
The movie showed that off well, but did the movie itself have to be so banal or so boring to watch?
I realize these aren't characters you're supposed to like or support. But I just kept thinking- why should I care about these people? I see movies for a compelling story or memorable characters and it succeeded in neither of these. 

The best part might have been the ending- where we transition from a Nazi party to the same building in present day now being a museum. Where there were people, there's several exhibits of shoes and clothing taken from Jews. Portraits on all the walls of the people who were murdered in this facility. 

Going into this movie, I kinda thought that it was a regular German family living outside the camp and accepting they're living next to these horrible chimneys where the air always smiles of burning flesh... I didn't know it was going to be the family of SS. 
Or that this was even based on an actual person. 
Other reviews had said that this movie was "inspired" by the book of the same name, but not "based" on it. Jonathan Glazer, the director, just took the idea and did his own thing with it. 
Anyway, to cut to the end of all this, the real Rudolf Hoss was sentenced at Nuremburg and later executed. And his wife never denounced or showed regret for what they did. 
I suppose they really just wanted this message to sink in, but for me, I think I would've preferred some sort of postscript. Just so I feel like some sort of "story" had been actually told here.

In my Holocaust class in college, we saw a couple of films. Mostly the propaganda films. But the one that stuck with me the most was "The Grey Zone." It showed the atrocities in the camps, people getting sent to gas chambers. Then the people working in the camp (one being David Arquette) find a girl who survived it and they try to keep her hidden from their superiors. In the end, she is found out and she's told to run to the exit... the movie cuts to black and ends there. To this day, I still don't know if they let her escape or she'd been shot. 
I was numb for a couple of days after that-- it genuinely broke something inside me. Thankfully at that point, I made some friends at school and being with them helped me get past all that. 
That's the type of reaction I expected to get from "The Zone of Interest," but instead I found myself being so un-interested in it... I kept thinking I should change the channel and find something else, but I wanted to see if it got better... it never really did. 
Not saying the movie is bad. I can objectively say it succeeded on some levels in sending its message. I just didn't like it and I wouldn't want to see it again. And that's perfectly acceptable.

Steven Spielberg called this the best Holocaust movie since his own- meaning "Schindler's List." I have yet to see that one and one day, I really should... I'm sure it'll fall more in line with what I expect from a movie on this subject matter. 

Saturday, September 14, 2019

Mr. Holland's Opus (1995)

Director: Stephen Herek (also directed "Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure")
Writer: Patrick Sheane Duncan
Composer: Michael Kaman (also did music for the "Die Hard" and "Lethal Weapon" franchises)

Cast:
Glenn Holland- Richard Dreyfuss
Iris Holland- Glenne Headley (RIP 2017)
Coltrane "Cole" Holland- Nicholas John Renner (age 6)/Joseph Anderson (age 15)/Anthony Natale (age 28)
Coach Meister- Jay Thomas (RIP 2017)
Principal Jacobs- Olympia Dukakis
Vice Principal Wolters- William H. Macy
Notable Students
Louis Russ- Terrence Howard
Gertrude Lang- Alicia Witt/Joanne Gleason (adult) Hall
Rowena Morgan- Jean Louisa Kelly
Bobby Tidd- Damon Whitaker/Forrest Whitaker (adult) 

Award Nominations:
OSCAR- Best Actor- Richard Dreyfuss (lost to Nicholas Cage for "Leaving Las Vegas")
Golden Globe- Best Actor- Richard Dreyfuss (lost to Nicholas Cage)
Golden Globe- Best Screenplay- Patrick Sheane Duncan (lost to "Sense & Sensibility")

Write-up:

Introductory Notes

I really need to get more in the habit of using this blog more often... there have been a few movies I've rewatched lately that I hadn't written about previously that I'd like to make time for. 

This is one of them. I watched a couple of weeks ago and I figured there were enough talking points and things I picked up for the first time that i don't want to wait too long to write anything. 

Why I love this movie-- first off, it's one of those inspirational teacher films I'm just a big sucker for. I don't know what it is, but I enjoy them so much. It's a subgenre I realized I liked and decided to see as much as I could. Kinda like how I had to see all the Brat Pack/John Hughes movies because I liked "The Breakfast Club" and "Ferris Bueller" so much... none of the other ones I'd seen, I liked nearly as much, but at some point, I'll get around to writing about "Sixteen Candles," "Pretty in Pink" and "St. Elmo's Fire." 
I think this was in the running for my top 100 movies, but maybe I wanted to get a little more variety so I didn't... watching it again, I don't know what I was thinking passing it over.

Also- I checked out the nominations that it got and couldn't believe it didn't win anything. Richard Dreyfuss did win an Oscar another role, but still... he was AMAZING in this movie. Plus, he got passed over for NIcholas Cage... not to knock Nicholas Cage, but somehow I doubt "Leaving Las Vegas" left nearly this much of an impact. I think the only reason he won over him was because he's a Coppola and the results were fixed in his favor.
And the Screenplay thing... Sense & Sensibility is an old classic remake dozens of times. Why not give it to something brand new that its likes won't be seen again? I just don't get it...

Another big reason I like this movie... it's about music and it's a time capsule of past decades. Makes you think about how much times have changed. 
Sadly, music and arts programs are suffering more cuts as the years go by. My thoughts in complete sarcasm: "God forbid the school cut any major sports programs :cough: football :cough:" 

Me randomly gushing about bits of trivia I found out and also actors I discovered had been in other things I'd seen...

One cool thing I found in the trivia: Michael Kaman (whose name I did recognize from the "Die Hard" credits... I maintain so much random trivia, it's ridiculous) was so inspired by working on this movie that he actually started a non-profit to donate musical instruments to underpriviledged children. We need more people like him in the world.

For other things I'd picked up... I'm one of those people who recognizes faces, even if they have the smallest roles, and I look it up on imdb to see if my instincts are right. The first few times, I remember recognizing Terrence Howard and Forrest Whittaker... funny thing I discovered today: in high school, the character was portrayed by Damon Whittaker and as an adult he was played by Forrest- who's 9 years older than Damon. The two of them look so identical, it's crazy.
This time, my mind was blown over the adult version of Gertude Lang who appears in the last scene of the movie, which is a big reunion scene where Mr. Holland receives a tribute from all of his former students who'd since graduated. She looked so familiar to me, so I looked her up. Her name was written as Joanna Gleeson. To me, Gleeson makes me think of Brenden Gleeson who played Mad-Eye Moody and I'm thinking "she's not a ginger, so she can't be related to him"... her maiden name is Joanna Hall. I looked through her credits and had a huge ah-ha moment. She played the Baker's Wife in the "Into the Woods" production where Bernadette Peters played The Witch-- also she won a Tony for that role. She's also been married to Chris Sarandon since 1994. Anyway, long rant over... I love that production so much and it's cool to see her in a different capacity. 

Back to the Movie at hand...

I gotta stop gushing and actually talk about the movie... SPOILERS will follow immediately...


The essential story is that Mr. Holland is a struggling musician who wants to one day be remembered for writing one epic song- hence the titular opus. 
But to make ends meet, he needs to take a teaching position. In his words, he said he got a teaching degree to fall back on, but never expected that he'd need to use it. In his case, he teaches musical theory and appreciation as well as instructing his band how to play their instruments. 
The movie follows him from when he starts in 1965 all the way to 1995... when the school decides they need to cut the entire music program to save money. There'd been talk of budgets and saving money throughout the money and certain things that take place are a direct result of that. There are a couple instances of irony displayed in the money and this is one of them. Naturally, he ends up falling in love with this position and sorry to have to leave it. But he isn't just fighting for his job in the final moments- he's fighting for the future of youth and how they need their minds enriched by music and the arts. 

Another irony manifests in his family and becomes a major plot point. 
There are a lot of compliments about how people with disabilities are cast in movies. A popular one is why characters confined to wheelchairs are portrayed by actors who can walk. And shows like "Speechless" were revolutionary because they had characters with cerberal palsy that were played by people with that condition (kinda sad that was cancelled- I saw it once a few times, but each time I really enjoyed watching it).
The irony how Mr. Holland loves music and lives for it... but when he and his wife have a kid, they discover later on that he's deaf. All of the actors who played Cole as well as the people in the school he went to, they were portrayed by deaf actors. 
None of the other actors went on to do anything major except Anthony Natale, who played the oldest incarnation of Cole Holland. This was an interesting find even though I never watched the series. "Switched at Birth" had characters that were deaf and he was a production assistant on the show, so his knowledge from living with this condition helped make that show more authentic. 

It's a big shock when the Hollands find out that Cole is deaf. Probably more to Mr. than Mrs., devestated that Cole will never be able to appreciate music the same way he does. The scenes where the two of them are struggling with how to deal with his deafness are a little difficult to watch and they still turn my stomach to this day, but this is something that happens in real life that a lot of people struggle with. Having that dose of reality shown so well is great. 
One of few complaints I have about the movie-- there's the 4th of July parade scene where Mr. Holland is leading the marching band and it's this big epic thing. The parade has a fire engine that sounds its horn and everyone is covering their ears and Iris checks on Cole to find that he's sleeping through it. Something about how this one scene is portrayed doesn't work for me. This movie takes place, presumably, in a small town and I assume they have this parade every year. They should know about the fire engines in the parade and not be so shocked by it making noise... and they shouldn't have brought their kids to the parade if they wouldn't handle the loud noises. But when the camera slows down to show Cole asleep in his stroller... the first time I saw it, I didn't understand why this was so dramatic where Iris was taken aback about it. When his diagnosis is revealed, it makes sense, but without knowing what to expect, I thought the problem was that he'd suddenly died. That's what scared the hell out of me about that scene. (Plus, I also have an aversion to incessant sirens... when I was younger, but also a couple years ago at a beach where a distant fire engine blared for what had to have been 5 minutes straight and I was so freaked out long after it stopped that I couldn't wait to leave). But what made her immediately think he couldn't hear it? Was so crazy to consider that he slept through it? I mean, the chances are slim to none, but still... it was almost dramatic how that was orchestrated. 

A major part of the movie is Mr. Holland dealing with Cole's deafness and coping with it. When first diagnosed, the first person they saw told them how Cole will use gestures to attempt to communicate and not to use them back because they won't help him in the hearing world. Iris insists after an episode that they need to enroll him in a school for the hearing because she needs to be able to talk to him. She also makes a comment that that first guy was an idiot because he thought of deaf people as mentally handicapped. I never really thought about it like that. I thought the guy meant that the gestures he'd try to use were incorrect because he hadn't been taught properly yet. 
But yeah, I think back in the 60's, people with deafness really weren't understood or appreciated the way they are now, so it had to have been realy difficult. 
Of course, Mr. Holland throws himself into teaching, so he doesn't really spend a lot of time with his own family and doesn't know how to communicate with his son well. 
One significant moment is 1980 after John Lennon was killed. He's very upset about it, but doesn't think Cole will be able to because he can't hear music. They have an argument (with Iris translating) where a lot of frustration boils to the surface. Cole tells him how he must think he's stupid because he doesnt know who John Lennon is or what music is and he could teach him what music is like, but won't. 

Personally, this was the first time I'd heard about John Lennon being killed. My knowledge about The Beatles was very limited at the time. It still isn't great, but I do know a lot more than I used to. Somehow, that was the one scene I always remembered. And later in the movie, at Christmas time, Cole put on some records and sat on one of the speakers and his parents came down the staircase to find him chilling to the music. Even if he only picks up the vibration of it, that was kinda cool. 
Mr. Holland later conducts at a concert that has people from the school of the deaf in the audience and he incorporated flashing colored lights in the show to make them a part of it. And of course he does a tribute to Cole, singing and signing "Beautiful Boy" by John Lennon. He prefaces this by saying the deaf in the audience will be thankful they won't be able to hear him sing it. Yeah, he doesn't have the best voice, admittedly... 

One major part in all of these inspirational teacher movies is how the teachers impact their students. The movie begins with the principal giving him a hard time for not giving 110% to his students and how she'd never seen a teacher break for the doors at the end of the day with as much gusto as his students. 
Then he starts to make an impact. Teaching Gertude how to play the sunset on her clarinet. Helping Louis Russ find the beat. Encouraging Rowena to aim high and go for her dreams.

One reason I wanted to watch this movie came from Rowena's story arc. He casts her in the school play where they're doing a Gershwin revue. In other words, a lot of classics. I don't know what is about this song, but this movie and the 2009 Fame remake- "Someone to Watch Over Me" is performed by someone in the movie and the teacher always asks them what they think the song is about because they don't seem to be singing it from the right perspective. 
Don't know why, but that song came to mind a lot for me a few weeks ago and I guess I wanted to revisit it. Rowena was singing it with a smile on her face, but after Mr. Holland explains what the song is about, she loses the smile and starts to put her heart in it. 
That's why I liked Harry Connick Jr. as an American Idol judge- he was more honest than the judges on the show had been in quite some time. And he always asks the contestants what they think the songs are about because that is essential to giving a good authentic performance. 
Taking current events into account, there was a storyline here that could have derailed this whole movie. It's hinted at that Rowena has a crush on him and even asks him to run off to NYC with her. He even names a song he's writing for her. If anyone heard about any of this, they would have launched an investigation and had him fired even though he was innocent.

The final scene where all of the students come together to wish him well and he gets to perform his opus with former students in the band... that's a great scene.
I know this is a fictional story, but I always groan that the movie ends with the performance and fades to black... because I want to know what happened to the other characters. What does Mr. Holland go on to do after he loses his job? Cole is doing well at a school for the deaf, where I think he is teaching. But I feel like other story arcs need to be concluded. Maybe that's just me wanting more. 

It's cool seeing the years go by and seeing the newsreels showing current events. But I almost feel like they skipped over too much time. We go from 1965 to 1970 to 1980 to 1995. I didnt think to calculate how much screentime is spent in each time period, but we really didn't get to see much of the 80's. It's also cool to see the fashion change from decade to decade. It starts with the girls wearing skirts and the teachers being adverse to Mr. Holland using rock music to demonstrate his points to skateboards and boomboxes. 

Speaking from personal experience, music has always been a big thing in my life. With my own music teachers, I remember my music teacher in elementary school having to travel to classrooms because of budget cuts that caused him to lose his classroom. It's been a long time, but I don't remember much about his teaching style, but he was a fun teacher. 
I went back to music in high school with concert choir. I also participated in all of the musicals with a company... I never got cast in any of the roles, something I'm still bitter about because they always went to the same people. As talented as they are and how much I admire them, I still kinda hate the favoritism, even if they were the best for the role. I really liked Ms. Cloak and gave a lot of effort in class. But it was annoying how everyone else, except the lead actors in the shows, treated it like study hall and would spend a lot of time talking when we need to be rehearsing. There was one year where it was the winter concert coming up and we still had a lot of rehearsing to do and she was very upset with the class for talking so much and saying we aren't even cloes to being ready for the show. 
Admittedly our drama class kinda turned into study hall after a while too, but it sucks being in class with people who don't really care to put in a full effort. 

Makes me think about one scene early in the movie where he's grading tests and the scores are terrible and he reads some of the "best" answers aloud. So it does take a little effort on both sides and trying to meet each other on the same level to really make progress. And obviously a lot of progress is made. 

Monday, May 29, 2017

Checking Out of "Bates Motel"


When this first came out, I was intrigued and excited to check it out (no pun intended). I'd never seen Psycho and since scary movies aren't my thing, I thought this was worth a shot. Especially since it was a limited series so there wasn't going to be a big commitment.
I remember also voicing outrage when they said it was going to be more than the 13 or so episodes originally aired. Surely, this whole prequel to this classic movie could be done in a couple months.
But in the end, everything worked out just as it should. The ending especially. It was looking dodgy a couple times in the final few shows, but once the ultimate resolution was revealed, it all made sense. And all things considered, it did the best possible by all the characters involved. Although Chick and Romero both got the short end of the stick I think... that's what was so great about the series. Weirdoes and bad guys made you root for them (not that I ever saw Romero as a bad guy).
In the beginning... 
 
This is going to sound so cliché but it's true.
At the start of the series, it was just Norman and his mother Norma Bates. She buys a motel and large house on a hill in the small Oregon town of Pine Creek Bay. This is something she does completely on a whim and doesn't even consult Norman about until they are there. As is the case with any teenager, Norman is not happy about these circumstances. And of course, Norma finds out rather quickly that she got a lot more than she bargained for.
 
I saw the pilot, I think, on the following weekend- not the day it actually aired. Knowing my Mondays, schedule conflicts most likely came into play.
I think one time I saw 2 or 3 back to back. It's seriously addicting once you start watching. I'm not a binge-watching person typically (I don't have Netflix- yeah shock/horror- and it's exhausting and time consuming) but this series is ABSOLUTELY binge-worthy if there was ever a candidate.
Ironically, the only other show I've binged... it's the one I'm covering in my next post.
 
Back to our characters though... Norma is so high maintenance and prone to overreaction, you want to kill her yourself. 
But she finds herself in trouble with the former owner of the motel (I think he lost it to bankruptcy which is why it was a bargain that Norma couldn't resist). What happens and how it resolves... there's a reason why it's on at 10pm. It was kinda startling at first. But that became part of the show's unusual charm. Barring any nudity and f-bombs, they're not afraid to "go there". [One episode later on had a "viewer discretion is advised" disclaimer and it was in reference to a final scene where a teenage girl attempts to seduce an older man... this, however, did not carry over to a 2-3 other episodes where sex or rape scenes occurred].
And drawing reference to the other series I will cover in a future post: it pushed the envelope of explicit content in the comedic department.

Also in the show we get to know Norman's friend Emma who has cystic fibrosis (she always had an oxygen tube around her nose and her tank was extremely portable-- her character lived with the disease, but never let it damper her demeanor), the town sheriff Alex Romero and Norman's half-brother Dylan. All things considered (Norma being Norma, Norman being more than a little off and the fact his father is Norma's brother) Dylan's surprisingly the most normal person in the family. I didn't like him when he was first introduced (can't remember why- it was so long ago) but it got to the point with him where I just hoped to God he survived to the end of the series. After all, Norman didn't have any siblings in Psycho.
 
The Psycho Connection 

**This is where the spoilers begin to pop up, but the biggest one is to the movie itself. For the series itself, I gave away nothing major**
 
Of course the house is practically a replica of the original.
But knowing what I knew about the movie (and then finally seeing it- what I know about that world) one thing was obviously going to happen. In the end, one or another, Norma wasn't going to be alive to see it. Heck, there was a preview to a finale where it looked like she might not make it... but she lived for another season and that particular finale was kinda effed up. Not going to sugarcoat it. But that's the thing about the series- you spend enough time with these people and you start to feel disoriented yourself. That's just how good it is.
The biggest love letter to the movie itself was in the final season where Norman runs the business as if nothing was wrong. But then Marion Crane comes to town and the shower scene happens... but it's not how you expect it. Norman did rack up a lot of casualties (I never counted but I think it's 10 or slightly less) and romance was never in the cards for him because of his mental issues. But the shower murder had a motive behind it which made him somewhat redeemable. Let's just say the person actually deserved it opposed to just being unlucky to cross paths with him.
 
Descent into Madness
The acting is amazing and so is the fact that Max Thierot, Nestor Carnobell, and Freddie Highmore each had a few turns in the director's chair (Freddie even wrote one of the last episodes- the acting was even more exceptional).
 
But the best thing about the series was how Norman's character was slowly developed over time. At first, you're led to believe- you know, his mother is a nut job and insane control freak, how can anyone turn out remotely functional living with her?  But as you spend more time with Norman, all those little things about how he was raised and how he reacts to certain situations, they all begin to add up. 
He has blackouts that grow steadily worse and it isn't until the final 2 seasons you see what happens to him during those times. 
Over time, Norma becomes more aware of these blackouts and that things aren't quite right with Norman. But in doing so, she pulls the apron strings even tighter and Norman never fully gets the help he needs until it's the last resort. Like when Norman goes to get his drivers license but Norma stops the driving test by telling the instructor about it and the whole thing gets derailed. Norman rebels but he never gets fully away from his mother and his home. It's comparable to a ghost that can't leave a house and is left to haunt it because that's where they died and it's impossible to solve their unfinished business. Except Norman is alive and the manifestation keeping him bound to his mother and the Bates Motel is in his mind.

On the other side of the coin-- Norma is certifiable in her own right, but aside from racking up dead bodies, Norman shows how unstable he really is when he agrees to check into a mental hospital for one of the later seasons. The reason he ultimately works to break out is discovering Norma got married. Granted, her past relationships have always ended in disaster and none of those men were particularly nice to her (although there was one to a very nice man that she broke off because... well, she found an excuse somewhere, I'll just say that cuz I don't remember)... but Norman is under the impression no man is good enough for his mother other than him, so he does everything to maintain the dynamic the two of them always had. Needless to say, it has some deadly consequences. I had a feeling that Norma would end up with another main character and it wouldn't end well for either of them... just based on the end of the Psycho script where it said Norman killed his mother and her lover.
However, I thought it was a tad unbelievable that White Pine Bay was led to believe Norma committed suicide... but we were there to witness the whole thing as the audience and the only other person to know the truth was conveniently thrown in jail to atone for various crimes he committed in his own career. I guess they needed to have that final season and that was the only way to assure it.
Perhaps the craziest part was how it took so long for most of the corpses to be discovered. Never mind that Norma (and Norman under the influence of "Mother") is so good at sterilizing the crime scene and how Norman's taxidermy hobby comes in handy. Or they just happened to be located near this big deep lake.
Season two, I believe, his favorite teacher wound up dead. He could be placed at the scene of the crime but he's cleared by DNA evidence that somehow doesn't match his. I'm still not entirely sure if she seduced Norman or it's all in our heads (his and the audience) but that was one of the bigger breaking points in the series. One of those no-point-of-return moments for Norman. He's so upset about the situation he can't go to school anymore and Norma homeschools him until he can get his GED. His illness is exacerbated because he never leaves the house or the motel he now plays concierge to.
 
Final Thoughts
 
Other than that I don't have much to add without spoiling the ending of the series. 
Even for those who'd seen the movie there are some surprises in store. In the end it all makes sense and it was the best resolution for everyone. Doesn't mean it wasn't sad though.
I have to get up at 5:30am to go to work, but I had to stay after the show for a cast discussion. You really get to know and love these characters, it's hard to leave, even if it's the best thing for all of us.
The part that's always trippy to me... hearing Freddie Highmore being interviewed. He is so good in this role, you forget that he's British and that he got his start in movies like "Charlie & The Chocolate Factory" and "Finding Neverland."
I also found out that Olivia Cooke, who played Emma, was English. That really threw me for a loop. Both of these actors are so good, you'd never guess they were putting on American accents.
Also need to give it up for Vera Farmiga- not just for being crazy good at being this nutjob of a woman :P but she's the one who recommended Freddie Highmore for the role. Not just great judgment on her part, but certainly a testament to his talent. This is going to be a tough role to top, that's for sure.

Sunday, December 18, 2016

Theatrical Review: Star Wars- Rogue One

Date: Sunday December 18 2016
Time: 12:45pm
Location: Pocono Movieplex (theatre 5)
Party: 3 (my mom, sister & I)

Director: Gareth Edwards (directed the recent "Godzilla" remake)
Writers: Chris Weitz (directed "New Moon"), Tony Gilroy (wrote for the "Bourne" franchise), John Knoll (apparently this movie was based on an idea he had while working on previous parts of the "Star Wars" franchise in the visual effects department), and Gary Whitta (wrote "Book of Eli" and is now working on "Sherlock 3"
Composer: Michael Giacchino

Cast:

Jyn Erso- Felicity Jones
Cassian Andor- Diego Luna
Chirrut ÃŽmwe (the blind jedi)- Donnie Yen
Baze Malbus (the mercenary)- Jiang Wen
K2-SO- Alan Tudyk
Bodhi (the Imperial pilot)- Riz Ahmed
Galen Erso- Mads Mikkelsen
Saw Gerrara- Forest Whitaker
Orson Krennic- Ben Mendelsohn

Duration: 134 minutes (+2 trailers)


Write-up:

Opening Comments

My mom tried to talk my sister out of seeing the movie with us. Hearing rumors of its PG13 meaning a lot of bloodshed and a high body count, she thought it might be too much. In the end, it all turned out okay. My sister liked it and we all have a good time of it.

The theater started empty at first. Just us three and one other person. Then little by little, people started trickling in... when the movie was already starting.
We got there early just to be sure we got a seat and we didn't have to sift through the dark and maybe we were too early, but still...

Trailers:

Thankfully we didn't start with a million commercials and got right to the trailers. That might have had something to do with the fact we had to tell the people in the theater to run it... it was a slow day. Kinda miserable outside with cold and rain, but it wasn't too bad. Nor was the snow the previous day.


Anyway, trailers...

we had the teaser trailer for the latest "Pirates of the Carribeean" again.

But afterwards, we had "Logan," which sounds like the last Wolverine/X-Men movie on Hugh Jackman's contract. It looks like a post-X-men world where Logan and Professor Xavier are the last mutants left. But then there's a girl with mutant powers who they need to protect from authorities. The overall look: it reminds me a bit of the Avengers movies. So maybe Marvel studios has more influence here- compared to the other parts of this franchise that's otherwise been independent.

The Main Event:

Within the first ten minutes, this movie sets itself apart from all its predecessors in two ways. And it all has to do with the iconic title screen and crawl.

What we have in a nutshell is the following: we're following the members of the Rebel Alliance who steal the plans for the Death Star.

Our main protagonist is thrust into the plot because of her father, Galen, who is the engineer who built the Death Star. While he is the very reason for its existence (in that it's a powerful planet-destroying space station), he is also a big part of its inevitable destruction.
Those who follow the Star Wars franchise will find this particularly interesting because it answers a few questions and criticisms.

After Felicity Jones earned Oscar buzz for "The Theory of Everything," she'd gotten a lot of good roles and this will probably go down as one of her best. She's the person that we experience the movie through, physically and emotionally.
It's also interesting to see Mads Mikkelsen in this after seeing him as a villain in "Doctor Strange." A bit of a different role for him and just as complex.

Cassian Andor is the head of the mission and he's interesting in that you don't entirely know which side he's on until the movie progresses far enough. The Rebel Alliance was a united front in the previous installments, but it's oddly disjointed in this film because these times are uncertain. Especially with the threat of the Death Star becoming more and more real every passing second.
But he's one of my favorite characters for sure.

One article previewing this movie said that the blind jedi would be a scene stealer and that couldn't be more true. Chirrut ÃŽmwe was simply a bad-ass. And he and his buddy Baz Malbus are a great combination that offers the few moments of comic relief this movie has- but both are strong additions to the alliance.

The main villain is Orson Krennic. Just seeing him on screen makes the hairs on your neck prick up. With that stage presence, you know nothing good is going to come. But he does have superiors to answer to and they're not to be taken lightly either.

The slow scenes- while they're good for character development, they had trouble holding my attention and I was close to falling asleep once or twice. But the actions scenes are so well done that they help make up for that.

For those familiar with the franchise, this film has a foregone conclusion that's easy to guess, but it's interesting to see how that destination is reached. It still keeps you on the edge of your seat through the course of the last 45 minutes.

And without giving too much away, there are some pretty cool cameos throughout the film. Some come about with the help of the latest CGI technology. It's pretty impressive.

Grade: A

Sunday, September 25, 2016

Theatrical Review: The Magnificiant Seven

Date: Sunday September 25, 2016
Location: Pocono Movieplex
Time: 12:30pm
Party: 2 (my mom & I)

Director: Antoine Fuqua
Based on Akira Kurosawa's "Seven Samurai"

Cast:
The Seven
Sam Chisolm- Denzel Washington
Josh Faraday- Chris Pratt
Vasquez- Manuel Garcia-Rulfo
Goodnight Robicheaux- Ethan Hawke
Billy Rocks- Byun-hun Lee
Jack Horn- Vincent D'Onofrio
Red Harvest- Martin Sensmeier
The Farmers
Matthew Cullen- Matt Bomer
Emma Cullen- Haley Bennett
Teddy Q- Luke Grimes
The Villain
Bartholomew Bogue- Peter Sarsgaard
McCann- Cam Gigandet
One Eyed Lucas- Jackson Beals

Duration: 132 minutes (+3 previews)

Write-up:
Opening Remarks
Easily one of the best audiences I'd been in for a long time. We got in kinda late (not so late that we missed previews, however) so it was too dark to see who was there. Just enough light to find seats.
But it was lively. Lots of laughs, oohing and aahing during the gun fights.

Why this movie got bad reviews, I have no idea. I mean, it wasn't a masterpiece, but it wasn't terrible. It was a fine callback to old westerns with some current big names.
And seriously, people these days want more diversity in movies yet when they get it, they complain... I just don't get it.
Backstory
I'd never seen the original "Seven Samurai," but one day, I hope I get that chance. If not on YouTube, then hopefully TCM will compensate me one of these days.
When I was younger, "A Bug's Life" was one of my favorite movies and I found out later on that was a version of this story.

But I know something about the original story thanks to my college animé club. Now that I think about... I think the story I'm about to relay took place 10 years ago almost to this day.

(after checking a calendar)

I believe our first meeting was September 27, 2006. And my first series ever (not counting Pokémon, Sailor Moon, Yu-Gi-Oh or CardCaptors- which some die-hards don't consider true animé series, but kiddie versions. Although the 4Kids English dubbing might have contributed... ok, moving on)...


Image result for samurai 7
My first ever series at the club was "Samurai 7." It's about these farmers whose land is taken over by bandits. In this version, they were robotic and mechanical. So a small party consisting of the village high priestess, her younger sister and a farmer goes into town to hire an army of samurai to defeat the bandits so they can have their village back.
Along the way, we meet these remarkable men who agree to fight for payments of rice. All with their unique personalities and contribute something different to help the overall cause.

The series only lasts 24 half-hour episodes, so it isn't a massive undertaking. I'd highly recommend it.

Previews

There were three. None of which were movies I really want to see.

Although with "Arrival" starring Amy Adams and Jeremy Renner, it's hard to say 100% no to it. Maybe not in the theater, but in the future when it arrives on network television. It looks like a modern take on "Close Encounters of the Third Kind." But since I hadn't seen that movie, I can't be 100% sure of that.

"Incarnate" stars Aaron Eckhart as this man who gets inside the heads of possession victims and helps them break Satan's hold on them. I don't know what a better movie would be to air this trailer at, but I sure didn't appreciate it. Those kind of movies freak me out and really shouldn't have been attempted after "The Exorcist" succeeded over 40 years ago.

"Kong: Skull Island"- I saw Tom Hiddleston and I immediately got a feeling that I knew what movie this would be before it got 10 seconds in. Somehow, in the back of my mind, I retained that fact and the fact that Universal Studios is putting together a new attraction with this same title.
My question: they already remade King Kong 10 years ago with Peter Jackson. Why do they need to do another one? Unless they're leading up to another King Kong vs. Godzilla movie, I don't really see the point.

But then again, I didn't grow up on these movies like some people in the previous generations.

The Main Event
The movie is very nicely split into three parts. Four if you include the prologue.
The prologue sets up how Bartholomew Bogue came to take over this particular town. We meet some characters that become important later on (namely, Haley Bennett's character, Emma Cullen) and the audience is set up to HATE the villain.

Part 1: we get to meet and know our seven outlaws. Emma and one of the other townfolk, Teddy, approach Sam Chisolm, an ex-outlaw turned bounty hunter to help them build an army to defend the town and take it back from the bad guys.
One by one, we meet the outlaws. Some are developed more than others, but everyone is free to judge them for themselves and find favorites.

Of course, Chris Pratt was a huge reason I wanted to see the movie in addition to knowing/loving the story of it. He'd been riding high (pun absolutely intended) in the box office between Guardians of the Galaxy and Jurassic World. His character isn't nearly as stupid as he looks (like his Guardian's character, Peter Quill/Star-Lord), but not surprisingly draws the most laughs of anyone in the movie.

Another of my favorites was Billy Rocks. He was part of a package deal with the legendary Goodnight Robicheaux and his specialty is knives. He is some kind of bad-ass and a good-looking one at that.

Red Harvest, an outcast Native American, also has some cool moments.

And Jack Horn got some good laughs as well. Vincent D'Onofrio, it feels like, has been everywhere since I saw him in "The Judge" and this is somewhat different than the past two times I've seen him. And it's kind of a nice change of pace.

Certain outlaws reminded me of certain samurai from that series.
Sam Chisolm is obviously Kambei, the strong, solemn leader of the group.
Jack Horn is like Kikuchiyo, who is a large mechanical samurai that's a klutz and the comic relief of the series.
And Red Harvest is like Kyuzo, although with a slightly different backstory. They're both men of few words that favor a bow and arrow. But Kyuzo originally started as an antagonist- a samurai employed as the bodyguard of the city's royal family (that's another side-story entirely and it doesn't carry enough relevance to this movie for me to dive into it too far).

Other than that, I don't see any other distinct similarities worth bringing up.

Part two is them getting to the town and making preparations for battle. This includes a montage or two good for a few laughs. Particularly when trying to teach the townsfolk how to shoot or handle knives (the latter was one of my favorite moments).
The movie slows down a little bit at this point, but that's made better with the comic relief moments as well as some back and forth between the town and what's going in the enemy's camp in Sacramento.

Part three is our big battle scene where anything and everything can happen. Lots of excitement, some heartbreak, but some pretty awesome conclusions to all this.

Emma Cullen also has a great moment towards the end that makes it all worthwhile. She's every bit as bad-ass as the high priestess Kirara in the animé, but she gets to do some actual fighting. Which is nice. #GirlPower

Conclusion
What can I say? I had fun with this one. Other than some pacing issues and running a tiny bit long in places... just don't listen to the critics on this one. Especially if you like Chris Pratt or Denzel being awesome ;)

Grade: A-

Sunday, August 21, 2016

Theatrical Review: Kubo and the Two Strings

Date: Sunday August 21 2016
Location: Pocono Movieplex
Time: 12:30pm
Party: 2 (my sister & I)

Director: Travis Knight (1st time director, worked on "Boxtrolls" and "Coraline")
Writers: Marc Haimes, Chris Butler (wrote/directed "ParaNorman") and Shannon Tidle
Composer: Dario Marianelli

Cast:

Kubo- Art Parkinson
Monkey- Charlize Theron

Beetle- Matthew McConaughey
The Sisters- Rooney Mara
Moon King- Ralph Fiennes

Duration: 101 minutes (+3 trailers... that seems to be the standard)

The Audience:

It was a decent group of people. Mostly families with kids between the ages of 8 and 13. They enjoyed it right along with us. Laughed at all the same moments.

Coming Attractions:

A Monster Calls
I had the hardest time deciding whether this was a kid-friendly movie or a horror movie. It's about a boy who goes to private school who is bullied and his mom is also diagnosed with cancer. He summons an imaginary friend, who I think at first is might be Slenderman (an Internet phenomenon that is reportedly behind some gruesome murders committed by kids). But there's more to it than that.
Plus, a monster voiced by Liam Neeson can't be all bad, right? I think this monster is a metaphor for helping this kid deal with his mom's cancer.

Sing
Looking at the first trailers of this, I thought it was a cute gimmick, but didn't know how much substance it could possibly have. Animals singing pop songs. But after seeing this full-length trailer... I think I might actually want to see it.
This singing competition was created to help save a dying theater, but there are all these animals that are just trying to achieve their dreams or change their lives. Who isn't gonna relate to that?

Storks
I'd already discussed this trailer in a previous movie. It'll be interesting to see how it goes when it's released, but I don't have a lot of expectations about it.

The Main Event:

Speaking of not having a lot of expectations...

My sister wanted to see it and I had absolutely no idea what to expect.

This movie is seriously so good that I really don't want to go into too much detail about it. I bet it probably be great in 3D with the animation. Really impressive. And you get sucked into it and it's hard to break free from it.

The story is also really good for an animated film. It could appeal to people of all ages. I'm sure people that are older than the intended age group might get a little more out of it. But I see this as the type of movie where, if you grow up watching it, it will be a different movie each time and you'll get a different message from it.

Kubo is an 11-year old boy who lives with his mother. During the day, he goes to a local village where he entertains them with stories, which he tells with his trusty guitar and the magic to make origami figures move. But he has to return home before the sun goes down. Not only to take care of his mother, but also because the two of them are hiding from her family. And they come out at night.

This family is her two sisters and her father, who murdered her husband (Kubo's father), and want to steal Kubo's remaining eye and steal him away to the heavens where they live an immortal life away from humanity.
There's a little more to it than that, but I don't want to go into it. Other than saying that there is some deep stuff here. Including what it is to be human and whether immortality is worth it when you consider what you're sacrificing.

The gist of the story is that there's the one time Kubo stays out after sunset (he wants to take part in a village tradition of honoring the spirits of loved ones and he loses track of time), his aunts find him and using her last bit of magic, his mother sends him away and brings the monkey charm he carries with him to life.
And along the way they meet this guy they call Beetle who says he was with Kubo's father's legion of samurai.
Their journey is to find the three pieces of legendary armor, which they will use to defeat Kubo's grandfather the Moon King.

The rest of it... I'll let play out as it does on the screen.
There are some funny moments, a lot of heart, some drama, action... just a little bit of everything. Something for everybody like I said before.

I'm surprised that it only made $12.6 million so far because it is definitely worth seeing.
As much as I liked "Finding Dory," this is the movie that really should win Best Animated Film at the Oscars next year. It's something special and unique.
I'm sure there will be a handful of people who will complain that, despite the fact this takes place in Japan and it deals with a lot of Japanese culture and values, none of the main characters are played by Japanese people. There are several Japanese cast members, but none play characters that are referred to by name in the actual movie.

At the same time, I think this would be a great film for my college animé club to go out and see. The values and symbolism used throughout the movie, I'd seen explored in some of the series we watched. If the movie is still playing by the time the club has its first meeting, I really hope they give it a shot.
But of course I'd been out of college for 7 years now (OMG!), so what I say really doesn't count for all that much. It's still worth a shot, though.

One final thing: stick around for some of the credits. Regina Specktor sings a really cool version of "While my Guitar Gently Weeps" while some animation plays out in the background. We also get a unique behind-the-scenes look at one of the film's big action scenes.

Grade: A
(If not for a bittersweet ending, I might have given it an A+.)

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Thanks for nothing, CASTLE

obvious spoilers for CASTLE ahead... not as obvious spoilers of the series finale


Ok, maybe I'm being a little harsh... but after last night, I certainly was in no mood to hold back my embattled feelings.

I don't know why, but for whatever reason, I started thinking about "A Bug's Life" and how some of its dialogue fit my feelings perfectly.

But first a little background:
Castle has been around so long that I almost can't imagine my life without it. Monday nights at 10pm are going to be very empty now. Especially with the news "Blindspot" is moving to Wednesday night at 8pm... yes, NOW it moves to another night when there's no more competition.
Maybe I should rephrase and say I can't remember Monday nights in the spring and fall without this show. Conceptually, it was brilliant. A mystery writer finds a new muse in an up and coming NYPD homicide detective and "thanks to his friendship with the mayor" he is allowed to come with the NYPD on cases so he can do research for his new Nikki Heat book series.

Wow, thinking back on that, I really miss those days... when it was just muse/kick-ass detective and writer... it was Castle and Beckett before Caskett.
I don't know when I had this thought- if it was in season 1 or 2, but I was thinking how I REALLY hope these two don't become a couple. Mainly because it's so predictable- all the shows and movies freaking do it.

Here's the crazy thing: with time, I warmed up to the idea so much that I couldn't have the show without Caskett... I mean, I was dying for them to declare their feelings for each other and begging for weeks that they get married after that horrendous cliff-hanger finale a couple years ago.
It was a triple-whammy: Grimm, Castle and Sleepy Hollow all had cliff-hanger endings that year and they involved someone being stuffed in a coffin or being presumed dead.
"Sleepy Hollow" hurt me so bad that I go the cliff-notes version of how Ichabod Crane and his "left-tieunt" escaped their coffin and purgatory and never watched the show again. And getting the buzz about how it got cancelled, I'm happy I did because that heartache, I couldn't bear.

"Once Upon a Time" hit me hard Sunday night- now this... so I hope "Agents of SHIELD" doesn't make it another triple whammy. All are ABC shows, so obviously I am going to be super pissed with the network for allowing all these shenanigans to pass.

Anyway, back to Castle... the writing and the characters are so good and memorable and they stay with you... seriously, this is a great show that I will remember forever.
Not only did it deserve better, but us fans deserved better than the raw deal we got out of it.

When we enter into a show or book series or movie or anything- there's always an unspoken contract of trust. We have the reassurance our heroes will ultimately triumph, the villains lose and at least the protagonist has a happy ending of some kind.
"Allegient" was the last time this contract was broken- and I am still not over it [and the movie is a year away].
This betrayal seems 10x worse.

Granted, it was going downhill for a little while. Oddly enough, Caskett had been married for only a few weeks, but the show had become like an old married couple that was trying to reinvigorate their love life... and Season 8 was a colossal failure in the Caskett department.

I guess you could say that maybe the show was doomed from the start. We knew Caskett was getting together. We knew that Beckett was obsessed with finding her mom's killer and she was never going to stop. This show loves its conspiracies, so obviously once we found out who killed Beckett's mom, that couldn't be the end of that story arc.

Although if I'd written the show, it would have ended a lot sooner- before the whole LockSat thing. Caskett would have gotten married when they were meant originally and that'd be it.

Season 8 suffered because of all the time Castle and Beckett spent apart- Beckett being a complete cliché of herself- not letting the case of her mom's murder go and "shutting Castle out to protect him"... so she pretended that she needed a break from their marriage and put distance between them. And of course Castle being like the loyal puppy he is trying to win her back.
I was so pissed when she walked away that I screamed at her- I burned with rage towards her for nearly a month because of this.
Another quote from "A Bug's Life" fits this situation perfectly- specifically on how the writers let this happen.

But as for the finale itself, here are my issues:
1) it was too dramatic



This show has its share of comedy and drama- but when the drama outweighs the comedy, I can't stand it. it freaking kills me. Pretty much anything having to do with Beckett's character arc- I hated- because the show moved away from what I liked about it.
Last night- from start to finish, it was non-stop drama. And the last two minutes destroyed me because I was ready to calm down and relax, but there was one final twist

2) it was too unbelievable

I know this is fiction, but you still have to have a believability.
Truth serum in the Harry Potter world- I can understand that. This does not exist in real life. And if it didn't, it isn't THIS potent.
At least make it look like you're struggling with it- don't just spill all the secrets... at least when Barty Crouch Jr. [see "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire"] was spilling secrets, he made it seem like it was a difficult thing to resist.
And a ceiling so magnetic that it disarms you of your firearms... ridiculous!

Also, I thought for LockSat would be Vicrom or some other character we knew for longer than 10 minutes... that was disappointing

3) it was MESSY- literally and figuratively

I know they only had a week to hash at this finale, but c'mon!! they could have done this so much cleaner. And I'm not talking about all the blood or potential casualties involved.

It was like what happened in Bambi- we get traumatized by whatever shots were fired and so on...
then the next scene immediately after it's all sunny and happy and cheerful- as if it's supposed to take our mind off what JUST happened.



Now for "A Bug's Life" to do its thing...




Seriously- I want to ask the writers this question... they want me to believe that everything's magically okay... or was the final scene a hallucination of the dream scenario that'll never come to pass?
The least they could have done is make it more cut and dry. Like someone calling for an ambulance or something...



the suspension of belief was WEAK- not just the final couple minutes but the whole show. No villain is THIS invincible or intelligent that they're always 10 steps ahead of the good guys.

So how the series (season 8) and beyond ended:








Andrew R. Marlowe started the series and ran it for several years. After he left, the show just plummeted into depths of mediocrity it could not dig itself out of.
Whether or not they were also the ones behind firing Stana Katic and Tamela Jones... I don't care... I'm going to blame them anyway.
Gotta blame someone, might as well be them.

I mean, this isn't as bad as "Gilligan's Island" (where they never get off the island) or "Lost" (they were dead the entire time!... and I actually laughed at that cuz that should've gone off the air ages ago).
But for me- maybe the worst finale I'd gone through since "Merlin"... I'm still not over that, by the way.


[Side-note: I've read two Richard Castle books- I think the first Nikki Heat book and one other- both were great reads. I hope I get to check out more]

Saturday, February 6, 2016

Moulin Rouge! (2001)



Writer/Director: Baz Luhrmann

Writer: Craig Pierce
Composer: Craig Armstrong



Cast:
Santine- Nicole Kidman
Christian- Ewan McGregor
Harold Zidler- Jim Broadbent
The Duke- Richard Roxburgh
Toulouse-Lautrec- John Leguizumo

Awards and Nominations:
OSCAR- Best Art Direction

OSCAR- Best Costume Design- Catherine Martin and Angus Strathie
nomination- OSCAR- Best Picture (lost to "A Beautiful Mind")

nomination- OSCAR- Best Actress- Nicole Kidman (lost to Halle Berry)
nomination- OSCAR- Best Cinematography (lost to LOTR: Fellowship)
nomination- OSCAR- Best Film Editing (lost to "Black Hawk Down")
nomination- OSCAR- Best Make-up (lost to LOTR: Fellowship)
nomination- OSCAR- Best Sound (lost to "Black Hawk Down")
Golden Globe- Best Picture- comedy musical
Golden Globe- Best Actress- Nicole Kidman
Golden Globe- Best Original Score- Craig Armstrong
nomination- Golden Globe- Best Actor- Ewan McGregor (lost to Gene Hackman)
nomination- Golden Globe- Best Director- Baz Luhrmann (lost to Robert Altman)
nomination- Golden Globe- Best Original Song- "Come What May" [fun fact: it was written originally for Baz's "Romeo & Juliet" and because of this, it was disqualified for the Oscars... which sucks because it's a beautiful song!)
nomination- Grammy- Best Compilation Soundtrack (lost to "O Brother, Where Art Thou?)

[another fun fact: Baz Luhrmann was snubbed for Best Director and Original Screenplay and there was a huge controversy about that... he directed the crap out of this movie, I agree that was a huge oversight]

Write-up:

Opening Remarks

It's hard to believe that this movie came out 15 years ago... and to this day, it's hard not to be dazzled by the visuals and get swept up in the excitement of it. Almost as hard as it is for me to get through the ending without ugly crying... this time, I actually managed with only a couple tears.
"Phantom of the Opera" is probably the one musical that I cried at WORSE than "Moulin Rouge"... and I believe that's still true.

When I was putting together my list of favorite movies, "Moulin Rouge" was part of my so-called "short list"... a short list of probably 200 movies (that I cut down to 101). I think the main reason it didn't make the list was that I hadn't seen in some time.
I don't remember my first impression when it first came out, but I knew that I really enjoyed it. The only thing that stuck was Ewan McGregor. I loved him. So cute and his voice and all that emotion. He was the first singing actor I loved. I later saw a bunch of his movies, but I don't remember any of them as much as this.

Between getting the soundtrack, watching some of my favorite figure skaters perform to their music and a story I'd been writing, I'd been wanting to see this movie again for a while. The last time, we were at the shore house waiting for family to show up. When they came, the movie was in its final scene and I was ugly crying. My aunt and uncle (on my dad's side) see me ugly cry A LOT-- the last time it was that bad was when we saw "Phantom of the Opera" on Broadway. And I was crying because I was so afraid the Phantom was going to kill Raoul-- although I distinctly remembered that he and Christine are able to run away together in the end.

Today was as good a day as any-- two years ago on this date, Evgeni Plushenko performed his "Tango Roxanne" short program at the Sochi Olympics team event... that I somehow missed seeing live by 10 minutes.
But more on him and my figure skating connection with this movie later... much later ;)

Quick Comment on Awards

I remembered this being one of those movies that got so many nominations... but I had no idea how few it actually won. The Art Direction and Costumes were very well deserved. There's no denying that. And with the Golden Globes, it was able to win Best Picture because of the split of comedy/musical and drama.
Looking at the movie again, I agree it probably didn't deserve Best Picture and Nicole Kidman didn't deserve the Oscar for Best Actress. You get a lot of flash and glamour and it's one of those movies that exemplify why movies need to be made. You just don't see that in real life-- unless you happen to be fabulously wealthy.
Even the soundtrack [a section onto itself] wasn't all that great-- there is so much good music in this movie, but whoever put it together was an idiot. At least that's what I thought when I bought it and listened to it. It was a huge disappointment. But maybe I was just expecting more and maybe the movie doesn't have as much substance as I thought it did.

The Story



of course...


SPOILERS


you have been warned...

The movie takes place in Paris at the turn of the century. All of it takes place in flashback-- one year after the events take place.


Christian, our leading man, is a writer. He travels to Paris in 1899 to write about beauty, truth, freedom and above all things, LOVE. By complete coincidence, a theater production crashes through his roof and he gets swept into the Bohemian movement taking shape in the village of Montmartre. It's lead (but of course...) by Toulouse-Lautrec. "Spectacular Spectacular" is the name of the show.
In order to make it happen, they need to convince Harold Zigler- the owner of the Moulin Rouge. A huge dance club where prostitute can-can girls perform and go on to seduce wealthy men for money. And this method of persuasion goes through the lead girl, The Sparking Diamond known as Santine. And Christian is the one elected to do it. I mean, he's helping them write the show now (all because he had the perfect line for their Switzerland-based show... "The hills are alive with the sound of music"). That same night, Santine had been promised to The Duke (the duke of what, I have no idea, it's never explained) and through lack of communication, she is led to believe Christian is the Duke. She does all of her usual tricks to have her way with him, believing he'll pay her handsomely for it.
Then of course she finds out he's actually a writer and upon The Duke finding the two of them together, the Bohemians convince him it's all part of their show and they're just rehearsing.

Much of the movie is about the show being put together and Christian and Santine falling in love. Of course, all kinds of shenanigans happen and all these obstacles come in the way of them and their happy ending.
And sadly, there's the fact Santine suffers through most of the movie with a fatal illness (damn Tuberculosis!) and :gulp: dies.

Acting and Actors

When we watch this movie as a family, my dad loves Nicole Kidman and I'm in love with Ewan McGregor. The two of them have such great chemistry. And of course they sing really well for actors... or people who haven't sung professionally before.
Christian is such an idealist, so optimistic. And he makes Santine fall in love with him because of the words he sings and the passion he dispenses. It's not to fall in love with someone like him. He's naïve, having never been in love before, but so what... this is a movie, dammit! I usually don't go to movies for realism. I enjoy the fantasy of them and believing in what they present.
With Santine being such a performer, it's hard not to fall for her too. She can be seductive, but also very playful. When she's seducing Christian, she's REALLY over the top and I can see why some people don't "get" that. There were points where I was even cringing. I mean, he's quoting "Your Song" by Elton John and she's practically having an orgasm. Seriously, what? Then he starts singing and it starts to make more sense. She stops the sex noises and just stares with her mouth agape.

Some scenes, John Leguizamo steals with his hilarious take on Toulouse-Lautrec. Although I don't know if he's meant to be the famous can-can painter or they're just using the name just like they're passing off all these modern songs as songs that were around in their time period...

I almost didn't recognize Jim Broadbent under all that makeup :P But then I didn't know who he was at all until Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince came out. That character is much more fun to be around...
But then again, The Duke did stake the deed to the Moulin Rouge on the musical being done the way he would like it. It's hard not to give into his demands when this venue is practically your livelihood.
The Duke, of course, is our villain and Richard Roxburgh plays him so well. I don't think I've seen him in anything else really notable besides this movie. But the good villains have a habit of sticking with you. He's lewd, but he's also dangerous for a lot of the characters. Has a bit of an ick factor about him. Money is probably the only reason anyone would be interested in him.

Prepare to be DAZZLED...


I wonder how much of a budget they had for this movie and how much it took to actually make... or if they even made all their money back. The set pieces really are spectacular and the costumes are some of the best I've seen in any movie. They're so true to that time period and just... WOW
I fall for the love story more than the visuals personally... going back to "Midnight in Paris" which is about having nostalgia for certain time period and wanting to live in them, I preferred the 1920's to the 1890's- that was the moment where Owen Wilson and Marion Cotillard's characters found themselves at an impasse. And it's ultimately why they didn't make it as a couple, despite having so much in common already. Certainly more than Owen Wilson did with Rachel McAdams, who he spent the movie engaged to. Why that is, I have no idea. It didn't seem like they had a lot in common.
...what am I doing? I already did a write-up on that movie.

My point is that I don't feel like I want to live in this particular time period or in the world this movie presents. [Personally, I don't "get" the Can-Can... great costumes, but the whole shtick of them is kicking the legs and lifting the skirts so you see the girls' stocking and underwear... This isn't me on a feminist rant or anything, women have every right to be sexy and seductive, but there are other ways than panty-flashing to get a guy's attention]
But I don't mind visiting every time I do return to it.
Most of the time, I'm just kept in by the love story and all the razzle dazzle.
The staging of the actual musical in the movie is really well done, pretty much staying in line with how the rest of the movie is presented.

Weak Points

This movie is very polarizing-- half the people who've seen it LOVE it... the other half hates it with a passion. Internet personalities Nostalgias Critic and Nostalgia Chick spent nearly half an hour (maybe more, actually) discussing whether it's a classic or a colossal mess. But this is my review, not theirs. :P

I will concede, though, that the movie isn't perfect. And by a lot of accounts aren't realistic.
Firstly, Santine is DYING of a deadly lung disease-- yet she's singing AMAZINGLY. But I will forgive and suspend belief for a while. Especially because Nicole Kidman sang her part so well.
Second... the one musical number that makes me cringe. When Santine has her sick day, a night where she agreed to meet with The Duke and Christian, Harold Zidler goes to The Duke and convinces him that she's "praying" to "cleanse herself of her former life to prepare for him"... and they decide the perfect song to commemorate this moment (and yes, every moment in this movie NEEDS a song to explain what the actors are feeling) is "Like a Virgin"... it's just wrong... the previous time I saw this, I finally noticed how messed up that scene is. Zidler and The Duke just ruined a perfectly good song by just making it sound creepy and perverted. Madonna made it perverted with her iconic wedding dress VMA performance... but it didn't need that chauvinistic lewd male twist on it. Just EW!

Writing may not be the movie's strong point. And there are scenes like the Bohemian group number "So Exciting," which is set to the melody of the Can-Can song where so much happens and it's so chaotic and you're expecting not just The Duke but US to believe that they know what their musical is going to be about. We all know that they're all making it up on the spot, but heck, it's so funny and enjoyable to watch that I don't mind it.
But at the halfway point, when the our couple is about to be torn apart (possibly forever), they're broken up by the stupidest of circumstances. Okay, maybe not the circumstances, but the way they react to them and carry them out.

Ok, ONE circumstance...
By this point in the movie, everyone but The Duke knows about Santine and Christian. Then one of the can-can girls asks him "why would the courtesan go with the penniless writer? Oh, I mean sitar player..."
We see her in the background a couple of times and this is maybe the one line she has in the whole movie. As far as I'm concerned (and I AM concerned), she's just here to ruin the movie. She has no other purpose (other than maybe being "victimized" in the Tango Roxanne scene). Now, if her character was developed more and we'd seen that she was jealous of Santine being the star of their group, I'd be willing to forgive this.
It's as if movies don't know how people break up... there's a random person that reveals a forbidden truth or a misunderstanding that takes place in the third act that derails the whole thing... "Moulin Rouge!" has BOTH of these issues... no wonder it didn't win Best Picture...

Christian asks Santine to run away with him and she agrees. Zidler tells her that The Duke knows about them and is going to kill Christian if she doesn't break them up and choose him. She blows that off and keeps packing. The moment he tells her she's dying... that's the one thing that makes her stop.
WHY? How is that stopping you from going anywhere? You're going to die no matter where you go and it's not as if there aren't doctors where they are going. So she cooks up this whole story with Christian to break up, saying she chooses The Duke because he offered her everything she could want. SHE COULDN'T HAVE SAID THE DUKE THREATENED TO KILL HIM OR THAT SHE'S DYING... she just says "I'm choosing The Duke"...
BULLSHIT!

Falling in love through song, now that makes sense... seriously, it does.

The Music

I'm almost done... now the best parts for last...

Yeah, so I didn't get this when I saw the movie the first time all the way back in 2001. We rented it from Blockbuster :P Those were the days...
Anyway, I didn't get that all the songs (well, excluding "One Day I'll Fly Away" and "Come What May") were already written in our time. Between the 60's and the 90's, no less. They were just given a modern, contemporary twist.
Dammit... "One Day I'll Fly Away" isn't original either?! How can that be? It's such a good song... there's no way it wasn't written for this...

Anyway, the moment Ewan McGregor sang "The Hills are Alive with the Sound of Music," I realized that the movie took all these songs and redid them so they were like new... or retro or something... it's confusing... a movie made in 2001 but takes place in 1899.
I knew more of the songs by this point and I picked out even more during the Love medley than I did the previous times.
Notably, "Heroes" by David Bowie.

I listened to the soundtrack on my commute yesterday. I swear on the first song, "Nature Boy," it felt like David Bowie's ghost was in the car with me. I felt chills in my hands. Or maybe that was just the cold air in the ventilation...
Anyway, it was almost spooky. Considering he just died and feeling his mojo in his songs. "Heroes" was featured prominently in "The Perks of Being a Wallflower," but I only just recognized it today in the Love medley.

The soundtrack, as I may have mentioned early, has its flaws. The production, especially. It's one thing when I play albums from the 80's that don't have the Dolby sound yet that amplifies the volume. (Okay, maybe not Dolby, but there's a reason why I have to crank the volume up for CDs produced in the early 80's vs. CD's now).
But the sound is so quiet on so many of these songs, I had my volume past 30 so I could even hear it... usually, I have between 19 and 22 with regular CDs. With 80's discs, usually, it's past 22, but never 30.

While it, thankfully, omitted "Like a Virgin" in the creepy perverted style, it also omitted "The Show Must Go On"... I was sorely missing that especially yesterday... more on that later.

Going through it when I first got it back in 2012 (wow, and I was sure I'd gotten it in 2014 after the Sochi Olympics...), the one song I really didn't like "Because We Can" but it was just chaotic and really had no point. But the few times I've heard Fatboy Slim, I haven't been pleased. So I conveniently forget that dude (or band, I don't know which it is) even exists.

I think I got it particularly because I wanted to invest in actors who sang. Robert Downey Jr. got me started on that. Johnny Depp on the Sweeny Todd soundtrack and Hugh Laurie soon followed. Hugh Laurie has a great voice, but I didn't like that his "Let Them Talk" album had not just covers, but really old Swampy music. He says they were among the first songs he learned on the piano with his teacher back in the day... I think I'd only heard it through 3-4 times since I got it. Way too old school for my tastes.

And I wanted to have Ewan McGregor at my listening ears :P but then I found myself disappointed because I really couldn't hear him all that well through most of the album. During "Your Song" and the Love medley, I kept hearing this male opera voice completely obscuring him. Somehow, I blocked out the fact that the fucking moon has a face and sings through much of the movie :roll: I'm sure Plácido Domingo is a famous opera singer, but did we really need him for the sake of making the movie more epic?
I just want to listen to Ewan McGregor alone :(
"Tango Roxanne" has a similar issue, but more on that later...

Nicole Kidman stands out with her vocals on much of the songs she's featured in. Just beautiful to listen to.

A Quick aside...
One thing I forgot to mention earlier: I'm working on a story that involves dancers that perform in musical numbers and some of them prostitute themselves for extra income-- of their own free will, they aren't pimped into it or contractually obligated. It's just a way to make a living in their neighborhood, set somewhere in South America.
My protagonist is in this business because her greatest talent is to entertain and be seductive and so on. And the framework of her business allows her to live life without love-- something she feels she can never have after two incidents with men, neither of which were particularly damaging to anything but her self-esteem.
I thought of going back to this movie to find inspiration I might be able to use for my story. But I was too busy staving off figure skating programs that came to mind during certain musical numbers :P I all but forgot about it until the scene leading up to the Love medley. Santine tells Christian that love doesn't pay the bills and she's paid to make men believe she's in love with them. But it isn't as if she hates men or doesn't believe in love... my girl Talia does fall into a similar situation, though, where a guy comes along that loves her and tries to convince her to give him a chance. There was even an earlier draft that had a love triangle and her struggling about choosing love over a sense of duty and the guy she's with lets her go.
Also in an earlier draft, I wrote that she occasionally has sex with Alejandro, but never takes him fully serious... how much that's changed- now he's just a guy that runs this club with her that she loathes because she still thinks he's a two-timing bastard... she caught him with another girl when she agreed to go out with him-- the girl was a crazy ex and she never gave him the chance to explain.

I also thought about my story during "Tango Roxanne" where this one guy talks about prostitutes in Buenos Aires and how a relationship with a girl who sells herself never ends well. (In my story, it WILL end well, I promise). And because they sell themselves to the highest bidder, there can be no trust. And without trust, there can't be love.
That was an aspect I was going to explore in my story, but I'm so busy developing my characters and having them interact, I probably won't get to really go into that.

Back to the show...Singing along to "Come What May" and "One Day I'll Fly Away" were great moments yesterday :D Great sweeping songs. They were also the few moments not obscured by unwarranted opera singers.
"Diamond Dogs" and "The Children of the Revolution" I had to get used to with time... but I do kinda enjoy them.
The Hindu remix of "Diamonds are A Girl's Best Friend" I didn't warm up to until the 2014-2015 season of figure skating...

Actually giving myself away from the soundtrack and not expecting too much from it... I enjoyed it quite a bit while listening to it. And it made the trip go by so much faster. [The speed limit is 65 on that particular route- and "Because We Can" fit in that capacity rather well].

Then I had a flash of nostalgia when I was remembering when "Lady Marmalade" came on the radio and was gaining popularity. And one of my friends was saying "voulez vous couchez avec moi ce soir?" actually means "do you want to sleep with me tonight?"
We never forgot that :P it didn't help matters that we both had French, but we didn't exactly cover Moulin Rouge in class. We did cover the Geoffrey Rush/Claire Daines version of "Les Miz," though...
They had four bad-ass girls killing it vocally :P Christina Aguilera (when she was just starting to break into her own, leaving the clean pop image behind), Pink (before she exploded), Lil' Kim (I assume before she had issues with drugs and jail time-- I just remember her being on Dancing with the Stars and not being a huge fan) and Mya (who had a great one-hit wonder with "The Case of the Ex" and I didn't hear from her again until Dancing with the Stars... or after that).
And of course I tried to sing Christina's part and kinda failed... that's why I do that crap when I'm by myself. More confident girls will do it in the company of their friends, but I'm not one of them :P

Which just leaves me with my favorite part of the whole movie... although seeing it again now, the section of it dedicated to Santine trying to seduce The Duke to get him to change the ending of the musical back to the original version (sitar player gets the courtesan)... that was hard to watch because he discovers it's a ruse and almost rapes her.
If not for the token black guy in the cast... he's one of the performers we see a few times, but he has no lines. Yet he's the one who knocks out The Duke (I screamed "Hell yeah!" when he did, lol) and brings her back to Christian... historically, him being there probably wouldn't have made any sense (about as much sense of "Grease Live!" having the inclusion of Keke Palmer when, I don't believe, high schools were desegregated until the 60's and the story takes place in 1959) but it's good they gave him a good part that actually meant something. And it isn't something cliché.

Anyway... I just loved the song... particularly Ewan McGregor's singing in it. The tone of his voice is beautiful despite the context he's singing about-- jealousy, Santine being with The Duke. It's hard not to get swept up in the theatricality of it. Maybe deep down, I'm just a sucker for a good Tango. All the dancing shows and figure skating have proved that.
Looking at it again, there is so much to watch and pay attention to. Not that it felt rushed or chaotic, but there was so many cool things about it that I didn't know where to devote my attention.
Then checking into how it starts, this one deep-voiced growly guy is singing the song and the bitch who spilled the beans is at the center of it. I started to wonder if maybe this was the cast's way of getting revenge on her for her truth-telling. At the end, there's even a mob scene where it looks like she's surrounded and people overwhelm her. Not sure if it was rape or not, but she deserved some sort of retaliation for her actions.

I mean, Santine would have died anyway... but just having one random character have no other point than to ruin the whole story... I'll never stop being pissed at that.
At least we did get a great musical number out of it. So much happening, so many great visuals, great visuals, amazing music... 

I found out a couple years later that "Roxanne" was a song by The Police, so I listened to it on their album. It was NOTHING like this... and I didn't forgive that until Juliet Simms performed "Roxanne" on  The Voice. One of her best performances (still think she should have won-- the winner that year never put out an album).

The Figure Skating Connection

Now we're finally here...

I don't think I made the Moulin Rouge connection at that point, but when we went to see Divas On Ice in 2002, a skating show full of strong women, one of the biggest standouts for "Tango Roxanne."
It was performed by Katarina Witt, the ring leader of the tour. She did the seductress role so well and she was on the ice with a mystery man. And in the end, he overwhelmed her. I don't think the footage is anywhere online, but all these years later, I never forgot it.
The show had people like Yuka Sato (Jeremy Abbott's coach), Kristi Yamaguichi, Nicole Bobek, Nancy Kerrigan and Ekaterina Gordeeva. Ekaterina, I remembered her performing "Simply Irresistible" by Robert Palmer with a guitar. We stayed afterwards when they were redoing numbers so they could edit the footage together for an ABC special so it showed everyone skating flawlessly with no falls. Her number took especially long to get right.

As I said earlier on, Evgeni Plushenko performed a short program to "Tango Roxanne" at the Sochi Olympics and I didn't see his performance live... what I found out later when he'd used this music before. It was part of a compilation for a long program he had in 2001. Not his best effort-- which I hate to say is because Alexei Yagudin outperformed him... however talented he was, he was one of the people who attacked Plushenko's character after he withdrew from the individual event at Sochi due to injury... there's no forgiving that.

He also used "Tango Roxanne" on its own for his free skate in the 2012 European championships. It was arranged beautifully by Edvin Marton, who'd arranged music for him several times since 2004. The commentators detracted at one point, saying the choreography wasn't brilliant, but one thing they said was true-- it's the aura that he puts out on the ice that draws people in. People like me.
It was one of those "I could watch him skate forever" moments. And what sold me in particular, if the music alone wasn't enough... there was something he did in this number that he did in his free skate at Sochi... THE moment that made me a fan forever.






Ashley Wagner, another controversial Sochi Olympian (Russia had one slot for a man to compete and Plushenko got it despite coming in 2nd at their national championships... Ashley got on the American team despite coming in 4th at the US Nationals), performed a medley of songs from Moulin Rouge for her free skate in the 2014-2015 season. It helped her win the National title in 2015. She also resurrected it this year and breathed new life into it. It didn't hurt that she changed her look ;) originally wore a red dress and with her natural blonde hair.







This season, she dyed her hair red and wore the white dress Santine wore in her final scene before she died.




She'd been off her game this season. At least with her short program. It hasn't been particularly strong, but when she did this free skate, she came to life and performed the crap out of it. Johnny Weir and Tara Lipniski, former figure skating champions and NBC commentators, were also starting to believe in her. Johnny in particular had criticized her for overperforming and said now it felt more natural.
Ashley is one of the few American skaters I get really excited about these days. The guys' field has been demoted by other countries, particular Japan. Unlike Gracie Gold, I see a lot of fire and sass in her and that's what draws me in.
Her compiliation starts with "Hindu Sad Diamonds," goes into "One Day I'll Fly Away" and segues flawlessly into "The Show Must Go On." That's especially amazing to watch and easy to get caught up in when she's doing well ;) I cheered so loud when she won Nationals last year.
Richard Dornbush from the US had a short program this year set to "Come What May" and he has the sensitivity and artistry to pull it off. But technically, I never got the chance to see him perform it cleanly. He accumulated an injury that kept him out of the US National Championships and that's the end of the year for him.







Ok, so I wanted to do this movie so I could have an excuse to talk about figure skating here :P

But why not? It's something I enjoy about and am passionate about as much as movies.

Ultimately, this movie has great music and anyone who performs to any of it is bound to catch my attention ;) and keep it.